|| Rock Art Sahara | Index | e-mail | Suscríbete | e-Listas.net | Foro | Uadi Kenta | DataBase | | ||
Sluguilla Lawash, an open air site with rock art in the Western Sahara(*)
Narcís SOLER MASFERRER, Jordi
UNGÉ PLAJA, Joan ESCOLÀ PUJOL, Carles SERRA SALAMÉ
Sluguilla Lawash is one of the most important open air sites with engraved rock art throughout the world. It is related to the style of the school of Tazina, characteristic of many of the rock engravings in the Western Sahara. Its great extension and artistic density make it a place of great importance in rock art. The University of Girona has begun the work of documentation and study, this being the initial work.
The University of Girona (UdG) has collaborated and
is collaborating with The Ministry of Culture of the government of the
Democratic Republic of Arabian Sahara (RASD) on various projects in
the Western Sahara since 1995. The result of one of those projects was
the creation of The National Museum of the Saharan People (Serra et
alii 1997). At present it is carrying out a project of documentation
and study of the Saharan cultural patrimony, principally in
This figuratism can be divided into different grades of schematism, which range from the most natural representation, where it is possible to clearly appreciate defined anatomical details - hoofs, horns, hair, manes ...- to animals very difficult to define due to an elevated degree of abstraction of the picture. The animals are generally presented in profile but there are some exceptions, such as that of an elephant head on. One of the most usual motives, seen on many rocks, also pointed out by other authors, like Milburn in Sidi Mulud, is a globe or ellipsis. We baptised it zeppelins as we did not hesitate to interpret it as bovines seen from above, from a perspective that we could call aerial perpendicular (fig 2). One obvious question, but necessary to take into account, is the fact that it becomes more difficult to represent in a natural form the animals that are engraved, even more so when the line to be traced is so thick and for the hardness of the stone all of which make it enormously difficult to represent very small details.
The rock supports, as we have mentioned before, are blocks or plaques of sedimentary stone of the Devonian era, of different colour and hardness. The artists knew these differences very well, only carving the softer light brown ones, while the harder ones which are black or a dark brown colour have no engravings. We only found one exception, an animal with elongated legs which had trespassed onto one of the hardest stones. Apart from these two principal types of rock there are other outcrops of sedimentary plaques with a great abundance of fossils, but here no carvings were found. Probably because the fossils would have distorted and made difficult a clean cut. The placing of the carvings on the supports are apparently aleatory, but in some cases the artist has clearly taken advantage of corners or cracks, or a natural relief in the rock to place the animals, (not for the realisation). Also the pre-existence of another figure permits them to use some cuts to form another animal together with the previous one, or within the same, that is to say, two animals in one, although this is a question that can be argued because it is difficult to decide whether they have simply made use of a previous cut or if they are associations with a special significance (Le Quellec,1993) (fig. 3).
The difficulty of tracing the cut which they wanted to be deep and wide, obliged a schematism to conform with the convention of style that has been named as the school of Tazina. These super positioning is unusual although we have documented several cases. Possibly the existence of many supports providing so many surfaces make super positioning unnecessary. These few cases of super positioning do not indicate different chronological horizons nor do they permit the detection of different styles. This leads us to suppose that the carvings were carried out within the same chronological horizon, within a range more or less wide, but which clearly shows the same cultural stage that was developed in this zone which disappeared when the area dried out and became a desert. It should be pointed out that the distortion of some figures, especially in their extremities which have a tendency to elongate, some with no possibility of continuation, until the cut disappears. Also there are incomprehensible lines separate from all parts of the body or which cut through them indiscriminately making it enormously difficult to understand.
All these characteristics are considered as belonging to the School of Tazina. Another of the particularities of this style is the idealisation or exaggeration in some figures affecting principally the hair, tales, manes and horns.
Rocks 26 and 27 ( (fig. 4 ) and ( fig 5) We shall add to this note the description of the rocks 26 and 27. Rock 26 is one of the most complex in the art of Sluguilla. It is to be found in sector F about 30 m to the West of the route from Rabuni to Bir Lehlu and was described by Milburn (1973) and known through photographes (slides) by Soleilhavoup (1997, 1998). We offer here a direct rubbing (tracing). The support measures 180 cm wide by 400 cm long and an average thickness of 15-20 cm.
The rock has several natural fractures which only affect, in one or two places, the representation and interpretation of the animals. We distinguish 10 determinable figures as well as lines which are indeterminable or very unclear:
1. An indeterminate figure with the shape of a sheep-hook (Milburn 1973) or it could be the head of a giraffe represented without details -horns, ears, details of hair- which would give a clear description.
2. An indeterminate figure, similar to the previous one. It is possible that it is the head of another giraffe. In this case it is a little more like the head of an animal. Also it is possible that it corresponds to figure 3. In this case the rock would have fractured after it had been carved.
3. An indeterminate figure. It is the hind part where the cervical-dorsal line arrives to the head. It is possible that it corresponds to figure 2 which is separated by a crack.
4. A giraffe, perhaps the principal figure of the rock which stands out because of its beauty overall in the representation of its skin, with circles of different thickness, difficult to carry out, even more so due to the hardness of the rock, and because of the hair of the mane. This giraffe is bending, perhaps drinking. We point out that giraffes, because of their long neck, always compensate by spreading their forelegs, supporting in this way the disproportional weight of their necks. The animal is represented with its forelegs separated with a double line in between that could represent movement. Another confusing line which is difficult to interpretate is that which leaves from the neck and with a double wavy line reaches the ground. There are other giraffes represented in great detail but without arriving to the level of this one.
5. The bovine situated in front of the head of the giraffe which we have described. This bovine only presents the head and the chest, without the posterior part of the body. The bovines with the forward horns are characteristic of Sluguilla as all the bovines are represented in this way. We only found a couple of exceptions where they were much more developed, even as a filigree.
6. The forequarters of an animal without a head, but with horns pointing backward. Note that the forelegs of the animal are elongated more than normal.
7. Three traces apparently aleatory but could have formed part of an animal which has disappeared with erosion.
8. Antelope with fantastic or double horns. It is not the only case of an animal with double horns. Perhaps it was the intention of the artist to represent two animals but using the same body. This also happens with rock 12A (fig. 3). Here apart from the double set of horns there is nothing to suggest two animals. Outstanding are the elongated hind legs which are placed over figure 10. Apart from this the antelope is no different from the others represented in Sluguilla as it has the hunchback characteristic of these animals.
9. This could perhaps be an ostrich. Ostriches are animals which appear very frequently in the art of Sluguilla. They are represented in profile, generally complete and often with elongated legs and necks. We also note the ostriches represented with folded wings but here we do not ignore the possibility that in this case they could be some other bird such as the royal bustard.
10. Quadruples with their heads turned back, comparable to fig 4 although more schematic. They can be identified as giraffe thanks to their long necks and little horns, (which do not quite touch the antelope). It is worth mentioning also the lengthening of the hind extremities which reach picture number 11 but do not cross it. It is also worth noting that the use of a single line represents the posterior extremities, belly, and anterior extremities which is usual in other animals in Sluguilla.
11. We find here a very complex animal. We are inclined to think that it is another giraffe. In any case the identification is not definite, it remains to be compared with other figures of similar characteristics and similar complexity. We could be up against another case of the representation of two animals in one. In the tracing it is not possible to appreciate clearly the detail of the hooves due to the reduced scale of the reproduction but they are appropriate for a giraffe. The head turned to the rear also reminds us of giraffes. On the other hand the back of the animal is doubtful: the two lines which leave from the beginning of the tail carry on to the end of the support, suggesting the possibility that they represent ropes, although it would be strange place to attach ropes to the animal. It is also remarkable the long line of the under belly, which could be an idealised representation of the sex of the animal, but we do not have any proof or sufficient examples to confirm this.
12. An indeterminate figure. Its original aspect causes confusion in trying to establish any identification. Outstanding is the quality of the possible head in the form of a drop, with concentric lines which coincides with what could be the neck.
13. A bovine representation of a characteristic shape, formed as an stereotype, not only in Sluguilla but also in other engravings and paintings in the western Sahara. It has the horns pointing forward and is in a standing position. Made in one line which is almost lost in the area of the horns and the upper part of the neck.
14. A large schematic quadruped, placed over bovine number 13. Its legs represent a curious bend in the final part, occupying another plaque of rock broken from the original after the animal had been carved. The head is insignificant, almost an anecdote, it has no tail, no main nor other details which would permit further identification. Its general aspect reminds us of a giraffe, but it could also be a generuk (antelope giraffe) due to its straight back, not presenting the inclination characteristic of giraffes.
15. Figure of an animal which could be an antelope. The only thing lacking is a larger hump. Its position gives a sensation of being alert with its tail straight and its neck slightly lifted.
The Rock 27 we have decided to incorporate in our work not because it is spectacular- which it certainly is- but to contrast the results with the previous articles about it. We found this rock also in sector F about 20 m from the route Rabuni to Bir Lehlu and about 20 m North of number 26. It is a support 65 cm long and 57 cm wide with a maximum thickness of 25 cm. It is possible to see on it 5 figures spread over two faces of the rock as can be seen from the tracing. A smaller panel is composed of two zeppelins side by side and oriented in opposite directions. Milburn only described the part with three animals placed one above the other being figure number 9 of his notes; while Soleilhavoup described only the other face of the rock with two zeppelins or what he identified also as traps.
1. It shows a line in the interior like the horns -supposing it is a bovine seen from a perpendicular aerial perspective- more developed and elongated with almost parallel lines.
2. The other smaller one has no decoration within its interior and the horns are slightly curved in elliptic forms. The larger panel is formed by three clear figures and individual lines or crossed with those the function of which we do not understand. It function could be decorative, complementary, accidental...This rock is the only case with three super positioning in the whole of the site. Other rocks of Sluguilla have simple superpositions as we have seen in rock 26.
3. Quadrupeds with the head turned backwards, with little detail that permit a clear identification. We suppose that they represent a giraffe or an antelope giraffe because of its long neck.
4. An antelope typical of Sluguilla with an identification of a hump, long tail and elongated legs. It is placed above the previous figure but also takes advantage of the lines of the posterior extremities as its own. That is to say the line of the chest and anterior extremities are clearly placed one above the other; whilst the posterior takes advantage of its line forming one and possibly denoting a short period of time which passed between the carving of one figure and the other.
5. Giraffe with few anatomical details compared to number 4 on rock 26. There is only an outline, but the form of the cervical dorsal line and also the head does not cause confusion. The characteristics of the terrain and the situation of the carved rocks help to imagine how these ancient settlers could live in Sluguilla Lawash; the animals represented were probably hunted by the men who patiently waited for them behind the gentle slopes, which in those days were probably covered with steppe vegetation, and of which they took advantage to ambush the many animals which go to drink during (beure durant) day and night. The vegetation could not have been very dense as it did not cover the rocks on which the engravings were carried out. Due to all these artistic engravings we know that this was a zone occupied by prehistoric men, probably a society of hunters and collectors, where hunting, due to the characteristics of the terrain, had great importance. The artistic representation should be given a great cultural importance so that the significance shall be known by everyone.
MILBURN M.:Sur quelques gravures du Sahara espagnol. La station rupestre de Ras Lentareg. Anuario de Estudios Atlánticos, 19, Patronato de la Casa de Colón, Madrid, Las Palmas, 1973, p. 197-206, 16 figs.
MUZZOLINI A.: Le Style de Tazina: définition, extension, signification de ses figurations les plus méridionales (Fezzan, Tassili, Djado, Aïr), Préhistoire Ariégeoise, XLIII, Société Préhistorique Ariège-Pyrénées, Foix, 1988, p. 179-201, 10 figs.
MUZZOLINI A.: Le Style de Tazina: définition, extension, signification de ses figurations les plus méridionales (Fezzan, Tassili, Djado, Aïr), Préhistoire Ariégeoise, XLIII, Société Préhistorique Ariège-Pyrénées, Foix, 1988, pp. 179-201, 10 figs.
MUZZOLINI A.: Les images rupestres du Sahara. Col. Préhistoire du Sahara, 1, Toulouse, 1995, 447 p. figs.
SERRA SALAMÉ, C., SOLER MASFERRER N., ESCOLÀ PUJOL J., UNGÉ PLAJA J.: Arqueología y cooperación en el Sahara Occidental. Actas del XXIV Congreso Nacional de Arqueologia (being printed), Cartagena, 1997, 8 p.
SOLEIHAVOUP, F.: Un gisement majeur du style de Tazina au Sahara Occidental. INORA, International Newsletter on Rock Art, 16, Foix, 1997, p. 1-7, figs.
SOLEIHAVOUP, F.: Lart rupestre au Sahara Occidental, Archéologia, 342, Février 1998, p. 54-65, figs.
SOLER MASFERRER N.; SERRA SALAMÉ C.; ESCOLÀ PUJOL J.; UNGÉ PLAJA J.: Aportaciones al arte del Sahara Occidental. Actas del XXIV Congreso Nacional de Arqueologia (being printed), Cartagena, 1997, 7 p., figs.
LE QUELLEC, J.-L.: Symbolisme et art rupestre au Sahara. Ed. Harmattan, Paris, 1993, 638 p., figs. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 "Sluguilla" literally it would be a female greyhound, a very fast dog, which needs great open spaces to develop its speed. This word is used by people to describe a plain surrounded by mountains which in reality describes this scenery.
 el gasra in Hasania it means " the little one" indicating that it means a small Sluguilla.
 legrad is the name of an insect which usually bites the dromedaries. But this name has been attributed in modern times, to a missile launcher used by the Saharian army during the war against Marroco, used in this precise zone, near to the wall constructed by the Marrocans.
 This noun could be attributed to either a person who performed feats in this area or to a tomb. It was usual among nomad tribes which traditionally roamed this desert to name areas of land after outstanding people who lived there.
 M.I.N.U.R.S.O. Misión Internacional de las Naciones Unidas para el Referendum del Sahara occidental (International Mission of the United Nations for the Referendum of the Western Sahara).
 So for security reasons we don't write the site situation.
 See the probable giraffes on Rock 26
(*)SOLER, N.; UNGÉ, J,; ESCOLÀ, J.; SERRA, C.; 2001. Sluguilla Lawash, an open air site with rock art in the Western Sahara, Les premiers hommes modernes de la Péninsule Ibérique. Actes du colloque de la commission VIII de l'UISPP. Trabalhos de arqueologia, 17, Vila Nova de Foz Côa, 22 -24 octobre 1998. Lisboa, Instituto Portugues de Arqueologia, pp. 281-291.
|| Rock Art Sahara | e-mail | Suscríbete | DataBase ||
|| Uadi Kenta | Foro | la Web ||